Penerapan Asas Keberlangsungan Usaha Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Untuk Mencegah Pailit (Studi Putusan No. 446/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga JKT PST)

Muhammad Irfan Maulana

Abstract


This research analyzes the application of the principle of going concern in the PKPU mechanism based on Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations through the normative juridical method, with a statutory approach and a case study of Decision No. 446/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Central Jakarta. The PKPU application by three creditors against PT Daya Guna Lancar was rejected even though the formal requirements were met, on the grounds that the value of the bill was below Rp500 million in accordance with Perma No. 4 of 2019 concerning Simple Lawsuits. This is considered inappropriate because it has ignored the preventive nature of PKPU as an effort to restructure debt and is contrary to the principle of lex specialis which is emphasized in the dissenting opinion of at least one judge. The results of the study underline the importance of the going concern principle to maintain the sustainability of the debtor's business and the need in avoiding the uniform application of general regulations in PKPU cases.

Keywords


Postponement of debt payment obligations, going concern principle, debt restructuring, commercial court.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aprita, Serlika. (2017). Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Menggunakan Uji Insolvensi: Upaya Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum Berbasis Keadilan Restrukturitatif bagi Debitor Pailit dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan. CV Pustaka Abadi. Palembang.

Ginting, Elyta Ras. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan: Rapat-Rapat Kreditor. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Harahap, Yahya. (2019). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Muljadi, Kartini, dan Gunawan Widjaja. (2003). Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan Edisi Revisi. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Sanjaya, Umar Haris. (2014). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Dalam Hukum Kepailitan. NFP Yogyakarta.

Sardjono, Agus, et al. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Dagang. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Depok.

Sjahdeni, Sutan Remy. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan. Cet. 4. Pustaka Utama Grafitti. Jakarta.

Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. (2016). “Tinjauan Hukum Bisnis: Urgensi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Akses Vol. 8 No. 2, h. 60-71.

Mawwaddah, Luthfatun. (2020). “Ketidakmampuan Membayar Utang Dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Oleh Mantar Pilot Lion Air.” Jurnal El-Iqtishdady Vol. 2, No. 2, h. 12. https://doi.org/10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i2.13817

Rahmadiyanti, Rindy Ayu. (2015). “Akibat Hukum Penolakan Rencana Perdamaian Debitor Oleh Kreditor Dalam Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Notarius Vol. 8, No. 2. h. 262. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v8i2.10266

Yordinand, Purba, H., Sembiring, R. dan Harianto, D. (2024(. “Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Sebagai Dasar Penentuan Kepailitan Terhadap Debitor Solven (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1714 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2022 JUNCTO 23/PDT. SUS-PAILIT/2022/PN NIAGA.JKT.PUSAT”. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 5. No. 7. h. 71-80. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v5i7.4376

Smartlegal Academy. “Yuk Pahami Penerapan Asas Going Concern dalam Hukum Kepailitan.” Smart Legal Academy. Diakses 19 Mei 2025. https://smartlegalacademy.id/yuk-pahami-penerapan-asas-going-concern-dalamhukumkepailitan/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15556153

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,