Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Pada Perusahaan Dalam Kasus PT. Apa Tobacco Nusantara Menurut Hukum Kepailitan (Legal Protection For Investors In The Company In The Case Of Pt. Apa Tobacco Nusantara According To Bankruptcy Law)

Fara Aulia, Ema Nurkhaerani

Abstract


This research discusses legal protection for investors in the bankruptcy case of PT Apa Tobacco Nusantara based on the perspective of bankruptcy law in Indonesia. Legal protection for investors is divided into two main forms, namely preventive and repressive, which aim to provide a sense of security, certainty, justice, and restoration of investor rights when a violation or dispute occurs. This study uses a descriptive analysis method with a qualitative approach, aiming to describe in depth the characteristics of the bankruptcy phenomenon and the legal protection applied. The results showed that in the bankruptcy process of PT Apa Tobacco Nusantara, all creditors' rights, including investors who have receivables, are strictly regulated under the Bankruptcy Law and the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (UUKPKPU). Bondholder investors have protection as creditors and get payment rights in order of priority, while shareholder investors are in the last position in the distribution of remaining assets after all obligations to other creditors are paid. The Financial Services Authority (OJK) plays an important role in the supervision and protection of investors in the capital market, although the risk of loss remains inherent due to the limitations of the bankruptcy mechanism. This research confirms that the bankruptcy process is complex and requires transparency, judge supervision, and information disclosure so that all investor rights can be optimally protected in accordance with applicable legal provisions.

Keywords


Legal Protection, Investors, Bankruptcy, PT Apa Tobacco Nusantara

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dewi, P.E. T. Juni 2016. Tinjauan Hukum Bisnis:Urgensi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan, Jurnal Akses, Volume 8 Nomor 1. Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Ngurah Rai, Denpasar, ISSN No. 2085-4544.

Girsang, J., Sudirman, L., Jaya, F., & Halim, D. 2020. Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Perusahaan Asuransi Terhadap Penolakan Klaim Atas Kehilangan Kendaraan Bermotor. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora.

Hamonangan, Alusianto, dkk. 2021. Peranan Kurator Terhadap Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Maju Uda. Universitas Darma Agung Medan.

Jamin Ginting. Maret 2005. “Kedudukan Pemegang Saham (Investor) Dalam Kepailitan Perusahaan Go Public” Law Review. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan, Jakarta.

Juniarta, I. D. A. D., & Sukihana, I. A. 2019. Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia Dalam Eksekusi Aset Debitor Pailit Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum.

Priyo Amboro, Yudhi. Januari 2020. Restrukturisasi Utang Terhadap Perusahaan Go Public Dalam Kepailitan Dan Pkpu. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Internasional Batam. Masalah-Masalah Hukum.

Sujatmiko, Bagus Dan Nyulistiowati Suryanti. September 2017. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Pada Perusahaan Terbuka Yang Pailit Ditinjau Dari Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum.

Jono. 2017. Hukum Kepailitan, cet. V, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Nugroho. S. A. 2018. Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta:Prenadamedia Group.

Shubhan. H. 2012.Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta :Prenada Media Group.

Sinaga, Syamsudin M. 2012. Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Tatanusa.

Sutan Remi Sjahdeini. 2016. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Edisi Kedua, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,