The Dynamics of State Administrative Law and the Role of Government in Upholding Social Justice: A Case Study of Public Policy Management in the Era of Digital Technology

Angga Galluci

Abstract


The increasing adoption of digital technology in public administration processes has brought about fundamental changes in the implementation and understanding of administrative law. The presence of technology not only influences patterns of government interaction with the public but also presents new challenges in the application of legal principles such as transparency, accountability, and public participation. Previous research has shown that digitalization can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of public services, but on the other hand, it also raises serious problems, including the risk of corruption in public policymaking and the digital divide. This research aims to analyze the dynamics of state administrative law and the role of government in upholding social justice in the digital era. The main focus of the study is on the alignment of administrative law with technological developments, particularly in the management of digital-based public policies. The research method used is normative legal research, using approaches from legislation, doctrine, and related legal literature. The results show that the government's role in the digital era is not limited to providing public services, but also as a regulator, facilitator, and innovator. Regulations such as Law No. 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE), Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services, and Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform No. Law No. 11 of 2024 is a crucial foundation for ensuring social justice in the digital realm. However, challenges remain, including personal data protection, potential algorithmic bias, and limited public digital literacy. Therefore, this study concludes that the alignment of state administrative law with digital transformation is a key prerequisite for creating transparent, accountable, participatory, and inclusive governance. Strengthening regulations, increasing the digital literacy of civil servants, and increasing public participation are key strategies for realizing social justice in the digital era.

Keywords


State Administrative Law, Digital Technology, Public Policy, Social Justice, Good Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansori, Umam, H., & Hartono, A. H. V. (2025). Analisis Normatif Terhadap Kebijakan Digitalisasi Pelayanan Publik di Tingkat Kecamatan dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik Dan Sosial Indonesia, 2(3), 213–221. https://journal.appihi.or.id/index.php/Aktivisme

Indah, N. (2023). State Administrative Law: Challenges and Prospects in the Digital Era. Kumparan.

Karim, A., & Aqiilla, N. (2023). State Administrative Law in the Digital Era . STIH-SA.

Marzuki, M. (2024). Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana.

Nugroho, N. A., & Bijaksana, A. (2025). Peran Hukum dalam Menjaga Keadilan Sosial di Era Digital. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(April).

Nugroho, NA, & Bijaksana, A. (2023). The Role of Law in Maintaining Social Justice in the Digital Age . Jurnal Amendemen.

Sutanti, KPT (2024). State Administrative Law as a Tool to Realize Social Welfare . Publishing Agency.

Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection.

Widodo, E., et al. (2023). Strengthening State Administrative Law for Sustainable Economic Policy and Social Justice . APHTNHAN Proceedings.

Wikipedia. (2024). Digital era of governance. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_era_governance

Wikipedia. (2024). E-democracy . Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-democracy .

Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Number 11 of 2024 concerning the Provision of Public Services Friendly to Vulnerable Groups, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/365740/permenpanrb-no-11-tahun-2024.pdf

Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services*, is stated in the 2024 Ministerial Regulation of PANRB (Article 29).

The Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB) emphasized the importance of inclusivity in public services.

Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Efendi, V., & Hidayah, N. (2022). The effectiveness of administrative efforts in reducing state administration disputes. Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23

Sutrisno, A. (2024). Analysis of state administrative court procedural law: a recent review and its practical implications. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i8.870

Yusdiansyah, E., Iskandar, R., & Hendar, J. (2023). Maqashid Syariah as a basis for establishing decree in Indonesia . Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14267




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16990640

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,