Analisis Legal Standing Pemohon: Studi Putusan MK No. 133/PUU-XXIII/2025

Amalia Wulandari

Abstract


This study aims to describe the Constitutional Court's considerations in determining the legal standing of the petitioners in Constitutional Court Decision Number 133/PUU-XXIII/2025. Legal standing is a key requirement that determines whether a petition for judicial review of a law can be accepted by the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and case-based approach to the decision. The results of the study show that the Court found that the petitioners failed to convince the Court that there was actual or potential damage to their constitutional rights as a result of the implementation of the article being challenged. Therefore, the petition was deemed inadmissible due to the incompleteness of the legal standing requirement as stipulated in Article 51 paragraph (1) of Law Number 24 of 2003. This decision emphasizes the importance of proving the causal relationship between constitutional harm and the norm being challenged in order to maintain the integrity of constitutional justice in Indonesia

Keywords


legal standing, decision, constitutional court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arliyanda, Muhammad Abdi Sabri I Budahu; “Legal Standing Pemohon Terkait Pengajuan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Media Hukum 12, no. 12 (2024): 10–12. https://doi.org/10.59414/jmh.v12i1.636.

Azizah, Sofia, Eli Soviatun, Vivi Yunita, Shafa Nurlaili Rosida, and Aisha Sofia Chandra. “Analisis Legal Standing Pemohon Dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Urgensinya Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Ciptakerja,” 2023. https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/id/eprint/44375.

Edo Maranata Tambunan, Rya Elita Br Sembiring, Frederick Gozali, and Dwi Mei Roito Sianturi. “Analisi Eksistensi Etika Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Berintegritas Dan Akuntabel (Putusan MK No. 90/PUU-I/2023).” Iblam Law Review 4, no. 2 (2024): 50–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.406.

Edward Imanuel Luntungan; Hendrik Pondaag;, and Sarah D. L. Roeroe. “Aspek Hukum Terkait Legal Standing Dalam Mengajukan Permohonan Ke Makhkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Privatum 16, no. 1 (2025): 5. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/61958.

Ihza Ibrahim. “Analisis Legal Standing Pemohon Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023.” Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Studi Islam 06, no. 2 (2024): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v6i2.135.

Putusan MK No. 133/PUU-XXIII/2025

Raga Nata, Akbar, and Muhammad Rifki Ramadhani Baskoro. “Analisis Dampak Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023.” Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM 2, no. 02 (2023): 105–17. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v2i02.288.

Sihombing, Putrida, Lailani Sungkar, and Susi Dwi Harijanti. “Makna Kerugian Potensial Sebagai Kualifikasi Legal Standing: Analisis Pengujian Undang-Undang Pemilu.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.318.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Mahkamah Agung

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Yasin, Muhammad. “Legal Standing Dan Kualifikasi Pemohon Dalam Judicial Review, Apa Bedanya MK Dan MA?”, hukumonline.com, 2020. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/legal-standing-dan-kualifikasi-pemohon-dalam-judicial-review--apa-bedanya-mk-dan-ma-lt5e3b973ccb352/?page=all.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17411271

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,