Pembatasan Diversi Terhadap Anak Ancam Pidana Penjara Lebih 7 Tahun dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Erik Wahyu Setiawan, Frans Simangunsong

Abstract


Diversion, which emphasizes resolving issues through restorative justice as opposed to the standard criminal court procedure, is a crucial component of the juvenile criminal justice system. However, Law Number 11 of 2012's Article 7 paragraph (2) on the juvenile criminal justice system only permits the use of diversion for acts that are not repeat offenders and carry a sentence of less than seven years in prison. This clause raises legal questions concerning how effectively these limitations align with the concepts of fair treatment for all, child safety, and the best interests of the child. This study aims to investigate the reasons behind the various regulations pertaining to youngsters who may be imprisoned for more than seven years. Additionally, this study examines whether these restrictions adhere to Indonesia's juvenile justice system's child protection regulations. This study uses two different methods: one related to laws and another based on ideas. Legal documents were gathered by researching laws and rules in libraries, along with books and other legal sources. They were then studied in a descriptive and analytical way using qualitative methods. Research shows that diversion restrictions are meant to keep a fair balance between protecting children, taking care of victims' needs, and serving the good of society in how the law is enforced. However, rules that only look at how serious the criminal danger is don't take into account the child's personal situation or how likely they are to turn their life around. Because of this, some people worry that it might make it harder for children to get to places where they can recover. Therefore, more adaptable methods of rerouting cases according to each child's circumstances better align with the fundamental principles of child protection and the objectives of the juvenile criminal justice system, which are centered on providing for children, aiding in their recovery, and promoting their social reintegration.

Keywords


diversion, Diversion Restrictions, best interests of the child.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Airlangga, Rendy, Hizkia Andhian Pradipta, and Dyta Widi Erdianto. 2024. Reformulasi Konsep Diversi Berdasarkan Cita Hukum Non-Diskriminasi. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8 (1): 1738. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p17-38.

Cianjur, Kabupaten. 2022. Proceeding Justicia Conference 1 (28): 2425.

Dehi, Amelia Putri. 2025. Optimalisasi Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak: Upaya Strategis Melindungi Hak Dan Masa Depan Anak Di Indonesia. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 6 (1): 17988.

Elfina Lebrine, Suhartanti. 2018. Penerapan Divers : Konsep Dan Problematika. http://repository.ubaya.ac.id/37898/2/Elfina Sahetapy_Penerapan Diversi_2018_Revisi.pdf.

Endriyanti, Megah Novita, Nurini Aprilianda, and Abdul Madjid. 2018. Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9 (2): 20413. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259.

Fahlevi, Reza. 2015. Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Lex Jurnalica 12 (3): 147255.

Firismanda, Charis Tantia. 2015. Prinsip Nondiskriminasi Dalam Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.

Hambali, Azwad Rachmat. 2019. HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ( Diversions for Children in Conflict with The Laws in The Criminal Justice System ) Abstrak. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 13 (1): 1530. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/kebijakan/article/view/568.

Irianti, Alif Kartika. 2017. Prinsip Non Diskriminasi Dalam Ketentuan Diversi Bagi Anak Sebagai Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual. Universitas Brawijaya.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, and M S Sh. 2021. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Prenada Media.

Muchlis, Ahmad. 2024. Penegakan Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Pada Penerapan Diversi Dalam Sistem Pe2024radilan Pidana Anak Jurnal Hukum Progresif 12, No. 1 (2024): 6677. Jurnal Hukum Progresif 12 (1): 6667.

Pramesti, Yohana Putri, and Frans Simangunsong. 2024. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Anak Penyedia Jasa Prostitusi Online. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 3 (1): 111.

Puspitosari, Hervina, Yana Indawati, and Frans Simangunsong. 2021. Hukum Perlindungan Anak Korban Narkotika: Perspektif Viktimologi Dan Harmonisasi Peraturan. PT. Nas Media Indonesia.

Sinaga, Evariawati, Sherly M Imam Slamet, and Indah Dwiprigitaningtias. 2019. 493-Article Text-1418-1-10-20210507 1 (1): 96121.

Taroreh, Royke Adrianus, Jolanda Marlien Korua, Nurhikmah Nacrawy, and Vicky Fransiskus Taroreh. 2025. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dengan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia. Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat 10 (2): 70116.

Wulandari, Utari, Fahmi Fahmi, and M Yusuf DM. 2024. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resort Kota Pekanbaru. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4 (1): 476674.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21242887

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,