Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Serta Legalitas Penahanan Jaminan Oleh Kreditur: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 1733 K/PDT/2014

Selma Dwi Amalia, Putri Ni’matul Maula, Muhammad Bintang Firdaus, Rendika Purnama, Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina

Abstract


Credit agreements as principal agreements are often followed by additional agreements such as collateral, which are interrelated in their implementation. This study aims to analyze the legal relationship between the principal agreement (credit agreement) and additional agreement (collateral) and the legality of collateral retention by creditors in the case of Supreme Court Decision No. 1733 K/Pdt/2014. The background of this study is based on a dispute between debtors and creditors regarding default, debt collection that is not in accordance with the agreement, and retention of collateral certificates without a clear legal basis. The research method used is a normative legal approach with an analysis of legal documents and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that credit agreements as principal agreements have direct implications for the validity of additional agreements, especially in terms of collateral execution. The Supreme Court ruled that the creditor's action of withholding collateral without a legal basis violated the principles of contract law, so that some of the debtor's demands were granted. In conclusion, this case emphasizes the importance of transparency and balance of rights and obligations in credit agreements to ensure legal certainty for the parties.


Keywords


Credit Agreement; Collateral Guarantee; Legality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Moch. Isnaeni. (2016). Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. LaksBang: Jakarta.

Handri Raharjo. (2009). Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

Frieda Husni Hasbullah. (2009). Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan. Jakarta: Ind Hill.

Sri Soedewi Masjchun. (1998). Himpunan Karya Tentang Hukum Jaminan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Salim HS. (2008). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada

Rachmadi Usman. (2008). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Gentur Cahyo Setiono. (2018). Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Proses Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jaminan Benda Bergerak Tidak Berwujud). Transparansi Hukum, 1(1).

Sihombing, J., Sahril, I., & Martien, D. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemberi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Pengalihan Piutang Secara Cessie Oleh Krediturdalam Hal Debitur Gagal Bayar. Cendekia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 1(8), 511-519.

Edwin Yuliska. (2023). Upaya Hukum Perdata Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Yang Belum Memuaskan Pihak Berperkara. Jurnal Normative, 11(2), 122.

Deasy Soeikromo. (2014). Proses Pembuktian dan Penggunaan Alat-Alat Bukti Pada Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 2(1), 12

Achmad, A.S., dan Indradewi, A.A. (2024). Kedudukan dan Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Tambahan yang Tidak Diperbaharui dengan Perjanjian Pokoknya. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora, dan Ilmu Politik (JIHHP), Vol. 4, No. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.

Sonji. (2024, Desember 03), Hukumonline. Asas-Asas dalam Hukum Jaminan. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/asas-asas-dalam-hukum-jaminan-lt674f890d16378/.

Nafiatul Munawaroh. (2024). Arti Judex Factie dan Judex Juris. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-ijudex-factie-i-dan-ijudex-juris-i-lt66f23b632843b/

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1733 K/Pdt/2014.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,