Analisis Yuridis Efektivitas Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Sebagai Mekanisme Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Salsas Bila Juniyanti Tanjung, Dean Putri Amelia, Aditya Rizky Ramadhan, Haykal Rizki Alvito, Rizki Rivandi Abdul

Abstract


Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre is an urgent study in the context of the Out-of-Court Dispute Resolution course, because it represents the practice of implementing international arbitration that meets the principles of fairness, speed, efficiency, and accountability. The study of HKIAC also reflects a paradigm shift in the legal world, from the dominance of litigation to alternative dispute resolution that is more adaptive to the dynamics of global business. The study in this study covers the working mechanism of HKIAC in handling international arbitration and the dispute resolution procedures at HKIAC as well as the requirements that must be met by the parties. This study uses a qualitative research method, namely an approach that focuses on understanding the phenomenon of the dispute resolution process, including the appointment of arbitrators, handling case administration, and ensuring compliance with arbitration rules. The results of the study are that the existence and role of HKIAC are very important not only in the context of resolving international business disputes, but also as a symbol of the transition from the dominance of the litigation system to a more progressive non-litigative dispute resolution system. With all these characteristics, HKIAC can be considered as a modern institutional arbitration institution that responds to the needs of global trade and the dynamics of the international business world with a professional, adaptive and trustworthy approach

Keywords


HKIAC, International Arbitration, Dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References


Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco: United Nations Conference on International Organization.

United Nations. (1958). Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention).

Buku

Abdurrachman, (1980), “Aspek-Aspek Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia”, Jakarta; Cendana Press.

Mardalis. (1999). Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Moses, M. L. (2017). “The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitiatif. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Artikel

Born, G. B. (2021). “International Commercial Arbitration (3rd ed.)”. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ). (1924). The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions Case, Series A, No. 2.

Situs Web

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre. (2023). HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules. Retrieved from https://www.hkiac.org/arbitration/arbitration-rules-guidelines

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre. (2022). Annual Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.hkiac.org/about-us/statistics

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). (2006). UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006. Retrieved from https://uncitral.un.org


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,