Indonesia Tidak Menganut Trias Politica

Mulyadi M, Didik Suhariyanto, Hartana H

Abstract


Trias Politica was first introduced by John Locke and then developed by Montesquieu.  The Trias Politica concept functions to prevent power from one power which can give birth to authoritarian power.  Trias Politica describes a balance of power, where power is divided into several regions to prevent arbitrary, bad power in terms of policy, law and politics.  Indonesia is a legal and sovereign country, where there are Executive institutions such as the President and his ministers, Legislative institutions such as members of the People's Representative Council and Judicial Institutions such as the Judicial Commission, Constitutional Court and Supreme Court.  With the existence of these institutions, Indonesia does not necessarily have pure Trias Politica, this can be seen from the perspective of legal politics that has developed so far.  The aim of this research is to explain whether Indonesia adheres to the Trias Politica system purely or not.  So in a conceptual way, legal politics can be seen clearly, even from a legal perspective it is clearly seen.  Meanwhile, the public still views that Indonesia adheres to the Trias Politica system by only looking at the government institutions that have been established, without looking at the roles and functions as well as the authority of each institution.  This means that research is very necessary for the development of state law in Indonesia.  State law is a type of legal science that discusses the theory of the rule of law.  Therefore, there is a connection with the Trias Politica Theory which was born from the thoughts of the English philosopher John Locke and then developed by Montesquieu.


Keywords


Trias Politica, Legal Politics, Indonesian State.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Daud Busroh, Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.

Kaelan, Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Untuk Perguruan Tinggi, Yogyakarta: Paradigma, 2010.

Moh. Mahfud MD. Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Cetakan ke-7, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2017.

Moh. Kusnardi, dkk, Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia dan CV. Sinar Bakti, 1983.

Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.

Maria Farida Indrati S , Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2020.

Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2002.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Cetakan keenam, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Widayati, Rekonstruksi Kedudukan TAP MPR Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2015.

Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 Amandemen Ke Empat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4415.

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Mahkamah Agung, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3.

Putusan MK No. 27/PUU-XI/2013 mengenai Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tantang Mahmakah Agung Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 Amandemen Ke Empat.

Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Batas Usia Cawapres.

Pengertian Negara Disertai Fungsi dan Unsur-unsurnya (gramedia.com)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16916609

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Mulyadi M, Didik Suhariyanto, Hartana H

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704